2005-October Archive by Date

• Messages sorted by: [ Thread ] [ Date ] [ Author ]
• Other months

04 October 2005

• Re: Petition for referendum  Christian Fredrik Kalager Schaller
• Re: Petition for referendum  Behdad Esfahbod
• Re: Petition for referendum  David Neary

07 October 2005

• Re: Petition for referendum  David Neary

09 October 2005

• Re: Petition for referendum  Bill Haneman

10 October 2005

• Re: Petition for referendum  Ross Golder
• Re: Petition for referendum  Elijah Newren
• Re: Petition for referendum  David Neary
• Re: [Foundations] Staying in Amsterdam  David Neary
• Re: Petition for referendum  Elijah Newren

11 October 2005

• Request for referendum  Dave Neary
• Community Service  Andrew Case

12 October 2005

• Membership renewal mails sent  Vincent Untz
• Re: Request for referendum  Vincent Untz

15 October 2005

• Re: Community Service  Ross Golder

20 October 2005

• Announcing the Reducing Board Size referendum  Vincent Untz
• foundation affiliations list/page?  Luis Villa
• Re: foundation affiliations list/page?  Vincent Untz
• Re: foundation affiliations list/page?  Luis Villa
• Re: foundation affiliations list/page?  Dave Neary
• Re: foundation affiliations list/page?  Jeff Waugh
• Re: foundation affiliations list/page?  Liam R E Quin

24 October 2005

• Vote NO on referendum to reduce board members  Luciana Bastos de Freitas Menezes
• Re: Announcing the Reducing Board Size referendum  Vincent Untz
• Re: Vote NO on referendum to reduce board members  Olav Vitters
• Re: Vote NO on referendum to reduce board members  Fernando San Martín Woerner
• Re: Vote NO on referendum to reduce board members  Alan Cox
• Re: Vote NO on referendum to reduce board members  Olav Vitters
• Re: Vote NO on referendum to reduce board members  Fernando San Martín Woerner
• Re: Vote NO on referendum to reduce board members  Elijah Newren
• Re: Vote NO on referendum to reduce board members  Elijah Newren
• Re: Vote NO on referendum to reduce board members  Olav Vitters
• Re: Vote NO on referendum to reduce board members  Olav Vitters
• Re: Vote NO on referendum to reduce board members  Glynn Foster
• Re: Vote NO on referendum to reduce board members  Claudio Saavedra

25 October 2005

• Re: Vote NO on referendum to reduce board members  Ross Golder
• Re: Vote NO on referendum to reduce board members  Murray Cumming
• Re: Vote NO on referendum to reduce board members  Daniel Veillard
• Re: Vote NO on referendum to reduce board members  Elijah Newren
• Re: Vote NO on referendum to reduce board members  Liam R E Quin
• Re: Vote NO on referendum to reduce board members  Bill Haneman
• Re: Vote NO on referendum to reduce board members  Fernando San Martín Woerner
• Re: Vote NO on referendum to reduce board members  Richard M. Stallman
• Re: Vote NO on referendum to reduce board members  Jody Goldberg
• Reducing Board Size Referendum - Instructions sent  Vincent Untz
• Re: Vote NO on referendum to reduce board members  Tim Ney, GNOME Foundation

26 October 2005

• Re: Vote NO on referendum to reduce board members  Alan Horkan
• font in GNOME's logo  Mohammad DAMT
• Re: Vote NO on referendum to reduce board members  Bill Haneman
• Re: Vote NO on referendum to reduce board members  Vincent Untz
• Re: Vote NO on referendum to reduce board members  Vincent Untz
• Re: Vote NO on referendum to reduce board members  Vincent Untz
• Re: Vote NO on referendum to reduce board members  Luis Villa
• Re: Vote NO on referendum to reduce board members  Vincent Untz
• Re: Reducing the board size  Anne Østergaard
• Re: Reducing the board size  Elijah Newren
• Why I'm Voting "NO"  Jeff Waugh
• Re: Reducing the board size  Jeff Waugh
• Re: Why I'm Voting "NO"  Vincent Untz
• Re: Reducing the board size  Vincent Untz
• Re: Why I'm Voting "NO"  Jeff Waugh
• Re: Reducing the board size  Jeff Waugh
• Re: Why I'm Voting "NO"  Vincent Untz
• Re: Why I'm Voting "NO"  Luis Villa
• Re: Why I'm Voting "NO"  Jeff Waugh
• Re: Reducing the board size  Tristan Van Berkom
• Re: Reducing the board size  Jeff Waugh
• Re: Reducing the board size  Tristan Van Berkom
• Re: Reducing the board size  Jeff Waugh
• [maybe] Re: Vote YES on referendum to reduce board members  Mark Galassi
• Re: Reducing the board size  Andreas J. Guelzow
• Re: Reducing the board size  Jeff Waugh
• Re: Reducing the board size  Liam R E Quin
• Re: Reducing the board size  Jeff Waugh

27 October 2005

• Re: Reducing the board size  Glynn Foster
• Re: Reducing the board size  Jeff Waugh
• Re: Vote NO on referendum to reduce board members  Richard M. Stallman
• Nomination process [was Re: Vote NO on referendum to reduce board members]  Alan Horkan
• Re: Reducing the board size  Richard M. Stallman
• Re: Reducing the board size  Liam R E Quin
• Re: Reducing the board size  Vincent Untz
• Re: Nomination process  Vincent Untz
• Re: Reducing the board size  Davyd Madeley
• Re: Reducing the board size  Jeff Waugh
• End does not justify the means [Was: Reducing the board size]  Jeff Waugh
• Re: Reducing the board size  Bill Haneman
• Re: Reducing the board size  Jeff Waugh
• Re: End does not justify the means [Was: Reducing the board size]  Vincent Untz
• Re: Reducing the board size  Glynn Foster
• Re: Reducing the board size  Jim Gettys
• Re: Reducing the board size  Anne Østergaard
• Re: Reducing the board size  Daniel Veillard
• Re: Reducing the board size  Leslie Proctor
• Re: Nomination process  Alan Horkan
• Re: Reducing the board size  Bill Haneman
• Re: Nomination process  Elijah Newren
• Re: Reducing the board size  Elijah Newren
• Re: End does not justify the means [Was: Reducing the board size]  Elijah Newren
• Re: Reducing Board Size Referendum - Instructions sent  Germán Poó Caamaño
• Re: Nomination process  Vincent Untz
• Re: Reducing the board size  Andy Tai
• Re: Vote NO on referendum to reduce board members  Andy Tai
• Re: Nomination process should not be public until after deadline  Olav Vitters
• Re: Reducing the board size  Vincent Untz

28 October 2005

• Some perspective on how unimportant the board currently is.  Nat Friedman
• Re: Some perspective on how unimportant the board currently is.  Davyd Madeley
• Re: Some perspective on how unimportant the board currently is.  Ross Golder
• Re: Reducing the board size  Izabel Valverde
• Minutes of the Board meeting 2005 Oct 26  Christian Fredrik Kalager Schaller
• Why I voted YES  Dave Neary
• Re: Some perspective on the relative importannce of the board.  Nat Friedman
• Re: Reducing the board size  Dave Neary
• New rules for the elections [was Re: Nomination process should not be public until after deadline]  Vincent Untz
• Re: Some perspective on the relative importannce of the board.  Jim Gettys
• [Fwd: Re: Community Service]  Dave Neary
• Re: Some perspective on how unimportant the board currently is.  Tim Ney, GNOME Foundation
• Re: New rules for the elections [was Re: Nomination process should not be public until after deadline]  Daniel Veillard
• Re: Some perspective on how unimportant the board currently is.  Fernando San Martín Woerner
• Re: Some perspective on how unimportant the board currently is.  Tim Ney, GNOME Foundation
• Re: New rules for the elections [was Re: Nomination process should not be public until after deadline]  Vincent Untz
• Re: Some perspective on the relative importannce of the board.  Leslie Proctor
• Re: [Evolution-hackers] [Fwd: Re: Community Service]  Garrett LeSage
• Re: Foundation sponsored training (was: Some perspective on...)  Ted Gould
• Re: New rules for the elections  Claudio Saavedra
• Re: Some perspective on how unimportant the board currently is.  Germán Poó Caamaño
• Re: Some perspective on the relative importannce of the board.  Nat Friedman
• Re: Some perspective on the relative importannce of the board.  Leslie Proctor
• Re: Some perspective on the relative importannce of the board.  Nat Friedman
• Re: Some perspective on the relative importannce of the board.  Jeff Waugh
• Re: Why I voted YES  Alan Horkan
• Re: Minutes of the Board meeting 2005 Oct 26  Glynn Foster
• Re: Some perspective on the relative importance of the board.  John Williams
• Re: Some perspective on the relative importance of the board.  Nat Friedman
• Re: Minutes of the Board meeting 2005 Oct 26  Tim Ney, GNOME Foundation
• Re: New rules for the elections  Vincent Untz

29 October 2005

• Re: Some perspective on the relative importannce of the board.  Richard M. Stallman
• Re: Minutes of the Board meeting 2005 Oct 26  Glynn Foster
• Re: Some perspective on the relative importannce of the board.  Glynn Foster
• Re: Some perspective on how unimportant the board currently is.  Glynn Foster
• Re: Minutes of the Board meeting 2005 Oct 26  Vincent Untz
• Re: Some perspective on the relative importannce of the board.  Murray Cumming
• Re: Some perspective on the relative importannce of the board.  Murray Cumming
• Re: Some perspective on how unimportant the board currently is.  Rodrigo Moya
• Re: Some perspective on the relative importannce of the board.  Richard M. Stallman

30 October 2005

• Re: Some perspective on how unimportant the board currently is.  Germán Poó Caamaño
• Re: Some perspective on the relative importannce of the board.  Jim Gettys
• Re: Some perspective on the relative importannce of the board.  Nat Friedman
• Germán Poó Caamaño for Foundation Board! [Was: Some perspective...]  Jeff Waugh

31 October 2005

• Re: Some perspective on the relative importannce of the board.  Quim Gil
• Re: Some perspective on the relative importannce of the board.  Jeff Waugh
• Re: Some perspective on the relative importannce of the board.  Glynn Foster
• Re: Some perspective on how unimportant the board currently is.  Fernando San Martín Woerner
• Re: Some perspective on how unimportant the board currently is.  Anne Østergaard
• Re: Minutes of the Board meeting 2005 Oct 26  Federico Mena Quintero
• Re: Minutes of the Board meeting 2005 Oct 26  Glynn Foster