Re: Some perspective on the relative importannce of the board.

Nat wrote:

> I think it would be healthy for GNOME if we defined
> the primary
> responsibility of the board as raising and
> distributing money for GNOME,
> and made it clear to the electorate that the ability
> to accomplish the
> same should be the main criterion in director
> selection.

I agree, since Tim's been the one who has been collect
the advisory board fees, finding new sponsors and
board members, etc. The board has had little to do
with raising money to date.

> _______________________________________________
> foundation-list mailing list
> foundation-list gnome org

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]