2014-January Archive by Thread
Messages are ordered newest-to-oldest in this index. The newest
threads will be at the top of this page, the oldest will be at the bottom.
Within a single thread, the first mail note is the START of the
thread; the notes following that are in the chronological order of
when they were received. So globally, newest messages are at the top,
but within a thread, the oldest (the start of the thread) is at the
top.
If you think about it, it is confusing. Just go with the flow and everything will be all right.
Fix wrong FSF's address in in source files,
Daniel Mustieles García
How can I remap the shortcuts for scroll down/up one line in Gnome-Terminal,
Marslo Jiao
Geoclue needs your help!,
Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
Hooking up gnome-session with dbus/kdbus/systemd,
Lennart Poettering
New developer,
Suyash Singh
How to set up to use different .gconf for different platforms,
jupiter
touch screen support,
Richard Henwood
Reminder: One Month Until UI Freeze,
Allan Day
Help wanted - FOSDEM desktop devroom,
Christophe Fergeau
GNOME 3.11.4 Development Release,
Luca Ferretti
Flock 2014 dates,
Marina Zhurakhinskaya
Smoketesting Development Release 3.11.4,
Luca Ferretti
TARBALLS DUE: GNOME 3.11.4 due on Monday January 13th,
Frederic Peters
Metabug to update FSF's address in source files headers,
Daniel Mustieles García
xkb vs ibus,
Geoff Streeter
Mass Reboot: Thursday 9th, 20:00 - 21:30 PM GMT+1,
Andrea Veri
Annual GNOME Bugzilla statistics for 2013,
Andre Klapper
Antw.: Re: [desktop-devel-list] Potential GNOME IDE,
Geertjan Wielenga
Re: [desktop-devel-list] Potential GNOME IDE,
Sébastien Granjoux
application testing via InstalledTests,
Colin Walters
Portals and Sandboxing,
Michael Ikey Doherty
- Re: Portals and Sandboxing,
Maciej Piechotka
- Re: Portals and Sandboxing,
Jasper St. Pierre
- Re: Portals and Sandboxing,
Colin Walters
- Re: Portals and Sandboxing,
Michael Hill
- Re: Portals and Sandboxing,
Colin Walters
- Re: Portals and Sandboxing,
Michael Ikey Doherty
- Potential GNOME IDE,
Sébastien Wilmet
- Re: Potential GNOME IDE,
Michael Ikey Doherty
- Re: Potential GNOME IDE,
Michael Catanzaro
- Re: Potential GNOME IDE,
Michael Ikey Doherty
- Re: Potential GNOME IDE,
Michael Catanzaro
- Re: Potential GNOME IDE,
Sébastien Wilmet
- Re: Potential GNOME IDE,
Michael Ikey Doherty
- Re: Potential GNOME IDE,
Sébastien Wilmet
- Re: Potential GNOME IDE,
John Stowers
- Re: Potential GNOME IDE,
Fernando Cassia
- Re: Potential GNOME IDE,
Michael Catanzaro
- Re: Potential GNOME IDE,
Reinout van Schouwen
- Re: Potential GNOME IDE,
Michael Catanzaro
- Re: Potential GNOME IDE,
Reinout van Schouwen
- Re: Potential GNOME IDE,
Jim Nelson
- Re: Potential GNOME IDE,
Fernando Cassia
- Re: Potential GNOME IDE,
Michael Ikey Doherty
- Re: Potential GNOME IDE,
Mike
- Re: Potential GNOME IDE,
Maciej Piechotka
- Re: Potential GNOME IDE,
Mike
- Re: Potential GNOME IDE,
Fernando Cassia
- Re: Potential GNOME IDE,
Julien Olivier
- Re: Potential GNOME IDE,
Geertjan Wielenga
- Re: Potential GNOME IDE,
Michael Ikey Doherty
- Re: Potential GNOME IDE,
Geertjan Wielenga
- Re: Potential GNOME IDE,
Michael Ikey Doherty
- Re: Potential GNOME IDE,
Geertjan Wielenga
- Re: Potential GNOME IDE,
Michael Ikey Doherty
- Re: Potential GNOME IDE,
Geertjan Wielenga
- Re: Potential GNOME IDE,
Michael Ikey Doherty
- Re: Potential GNOME IDE,
Michael Ikey Doherty
- Re: Potential GNOME IDE,
Mike
- Re: Potential GNOME IDE,
meg ford
- Re: Potential GNOME IDE,
Michael Ikey Doherty
- Re: Potential GNOME IDE,
Michael Ikey Doherty
- Re: Potential GNOME IDE,
meg ford
- Re: Portals and Sandboxing,
Alexander Larsson
Re: Backend design advice,
Sam Thursfield
Mail converted by MHonArc