Re: Portals and Sandboxing

On Thu, 2014-01-02 at 12:57 -0500, Colin Walters wrote:
On Thu, 2014-01-02 at 15:22 +0000, Michael Ikey Doherty wrote:

The idea is to wrap the dbus interface, etc, in a "portal" library.

But I'd expect that the DBus API is the underlying ultimately stable
thing, and the portal library (where it need exist at all) is just a
convenience wrapper.  Right?

That is the idea yes. "portal" library is merely a wrapper/connection to
a user-run service that essentially cannot change API. A bit of trial
and error would need to first be employed, to find a generic enough
interface suitable to never changing. Perhaps merely wrapping varags
into a dict over dbus would be enough.

Intel Corporation (UK) Limited
Registered No. 1134945 (England)
Registered Office: Pipers Way, Swindon SN3 1RJ
VAT No: 860 2173 47

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]