Re: Potential GNOME IDE

[Geertjan Wielenga <geertjan wielenga oracle com>]

Looking at the screenshots it looks more like a JDK or Gnome bug. There 
are no layout or painting issues in the screenshot, just the window 
decorations are missing. We need IDE log to see what’s wrong.

Gj

On 01/06/2014 09:28 AM, Michael Ikey Doherty wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-01-06 at 08:54 +0100, Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
> > Can someone send a screenshot showing how NetBeans is not so well
> > integrated? Then we can create an issue in the NetBeans bugtracker and
> > get it fixed.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Gj
> Please see my G+ album for two screenshots:
> https://plus.google.com/+IkeyDoherty/posts/bs7UADZ2v7r
>
> Swing popups are undecorated, no doubt due to the fact they're actually
> undecorated windows, not using a popup class. Spacing and padding is off
> on all menus and buttons (not wide enough). Icon tabs (not sure what
> you're calling them in Netbeans) in the preferences dialog use the
> Nimbus look and feel, as opposed to falling back to a GTK style button.
>
> Spacing is off on menus, etc. Icons are Nimbus, not GTK (though this is
> most likely just not going to be fixed, due to a lack of support for
> native theme access (freedesktop icons))
>
> Happy to report other issues if required. Problem is that the GTK theme
> in Swing merely uses a GTK2 library to render pixmaps in Swings own way.
> Native integration is always going to be an enormous obstacle with a
> non-native approach (Which exists for obvious reasons, I know. Just
> reporting :))
>
> Kind Regards,
> Ikey Doherty
>
> > On 01/06/2014 08:51 AM, Julien Olivier wrote:
> > > Le lundi 06 janvier 2014 à 01:45 -0200, Fernando Cassia a écrit :
> > > > On Sun, Jan 5, 2014 at 7:55 PM, Mike <mikeandmore gmail com> wrote:
> > > > > I guess that's why there are users perfer to use "ugly" IDE like netbeans
> > > > > rather than a good looking Anjuta.
> > > > If everyone keeps repeating the "Netbeans is ugly" line, does it make
> > > > it true? Less complete than this hypothetical new IDE that is yet to
> > > > be written. ;)
> > > I really think that by "it's ugly", all he meant was that it looked ugly
> > > (and not so well integrated) compared to a native GTK3 app in a GNOME 3
> > > environment. And this is *true*, even if not *important*.
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > desktop-devel-list mailing list
> > > desktop-devel-list gnome org
> > > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
> > _______________________________________________
> > desktop-devel-list mailing list
> > desktop-devel-list gnome org
> > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Intel Corporation (UK) Limited
> Registered No. 1134945 (England)
> Registered Office: Pipers Way, Swindon SN3 1RJ
> VAT No: 860 2173 47
>
> This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
> the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
> by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
> recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.