Messages are ordered newest-to-oldest in this index. The newest
threads will be at the top of this page, the oldest will be at the bottom.
Within a single thread, the first mail note is the START of the
thread; the notes following that are in the chronological order of
when they were received. So globally, newest messages are at the top,
but within a thread, the oldest (the start of the thread) is at the
top.
If you think about it, it is confusing. Just go with the flow and everything will be all right.
- Money spending, questions for the candidates,
Philip Van Hoof
- GNOME dependent on Mono,
Richard Stallman
- Re: GNOME dependent on Mono,
Bastien Nocera
- Re: GNOME dependent on Mono,
Jeff Waugh
- Re: GNOME dependent on Mono,
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra
- Re: GNOME dependent on Mono,
Jeff Waugh
- Re: GNOME dependent on Mono,
Luis Villa
- Re: GNOME dependent on Mono,
BJörn Lindqvist
- Re: GNOME dependent on Mono,
Luis Villa
- Re: GNOME dependent on Mono,
Dave Neary
- Re: GNOME dependent on Mono,
Jonathan Blandford
- Re: GNOME dependent on Mono,
Luis Villa
- Re: GNOME dependent on Mono,
BJörn Lindqvist
- Re: GNOME dependent on Mono,
Luis Villa
- Re: GNOME dependent on Mono,
Joe Shaw
- Re: GNOME dependent on Mono,
Behdad Esfahbod
- Re: GNOME dependent on Mono,
Richard Stallman
- Re: GNOME dependent on Mono,
Richard Stallman
- Re: GNOME dependent on Mono,
Joe Shaw
- Re: GNOME dependent on Mono,
Richard Stallman
- Re: GNOME dependent on Mono,
Richard Stallman
- Re: GNOME dependent on Mono,
jamie
- Re: GNOME dependent on Mono,
Gabriel Burt
- Re: GNOME dependent on Mono,
Diego Escalante Urrelo
- Re: GNOME dependent on Mono,
Joe Shaw
- Re: GNOME dependent on Mono,
Richard Stallman
- Re: GNOME dependent on Mono,
Jeff Waugh
- Re: GNOME dependent on Mono,
Joe Shaw
- Re: GNOME dependent on Mono,
Jeff Waugh
- Re: GNOME dependent on Mono,
jamie
- Re: GNOME dependent on Mono,
Alan Cox
- Re: GNOME dependent on Mono,
Richard Stallman
- Re: GNOME dependent on Mono,
Joe Shaw
- Re: GNOME dependent on Mono,
Vincent Untz
- Re: GNOME dependent on Mono,
Joe Shaw
- Re: GNOME dependent on Mono,
Behdad Esfahbod
- Re: GNOME dependent on Mono,
Og Maciel
- Re: GNOME dependent on Mono,
Jeff Waugh
- Re: GNOME dependent on Mono,
Richard Stallman
- Re: GNOME dependent on Mono,
John (J5) Palmieri
- Re: GNOME dependent on Mono,
Dave Neary
- Re: GNOME dependent on Mono,
Kalle Vahlman
- Re: GNOME dependent on Mono,
Claudio Saavedra
- Re: GNOME dependent on Mono,
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra
- Re: GNOME dependent on Mono,
Rodrigo Moya
- Re: GNOME dependent on Mono,
John (J5) Palmieri
- Re: GNOME dependent on Mono,
Shaun McCance
- Question to candidates: what about next ODF?,
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra
- Re: Can we improve things?,
Federico Mena Quintero
- Call for logo -- GNOME Asia Summit,
Emily chen
- two questions for candidates,
Richard Stallman
- GNOME Foundation Elections - Ballots sent,
Baris Cicek
- Re: GNOME Foundation Statement on ECMA TC45-M Participation,
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra
- Re: GNOME Foundation Statement on ECMA TC45-M Participation,
Olav Vitters
- Re: GNOME Foundation Statement on ECMA TC45-M Participation,
Jody Goldberg
- Re: GNOME Foundation Statement on ECMA TC45-M Participation,
Jeff Waugh
- Re: GNOME Foundation Statement on ECMA TC45-M Participation,
BJörn Lindqvist
- Re: GNOME Foundation Statement on ECMA TC45-M Participation,
Jody Goldberg
- Re: GNOME Foundation Statement on ECMA TC45-M Participation,
jamie
- Re: GNOME Foundation Statement on ECMA TC45-M Participation,
Jeff Waugh
- Re: GNOME Foundation Statement on ECMA TC45-M Participation,
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra
- Re: GNOME Foundation Statement on ECMA TC45-M Participation,
Jody Goldberg
- Re: GNOME Foundation Statement on ECMA TC45-M Participation,
jamie
- Re: GNOME Foundation Statement on ECMA TC45-M Participation,
Jeff Waugh
- Re: GNOME Foundation Statement on ECMA TC45-M Participation,
jamie
- Re: GNOME Foundation Statement on ECMA TC45-M Participation,
Jeff Waugh
- Re: GNOME Foundation Statement on ECMA TC45-M Participation,
Gregory Leblanc
- Re: GNOME Foundation Statement on ECMA TC45-M Participation,
jamie
- Re: GNOME Foundation Statement on ECMA TC45-M Participation,
Richard Stallman
- Re: GNOME Foundation Statement on ECMA TC45-M Participation,
Richard Stallman
- Questions to the candidates,
Anne Østergaard
- A question to candidates,
Dave Neary
- GNOME Foundation Board Meeting minutes :: 15th November 2007,
Glynn Foster
- GNOME Foundation Meeting Minutes :: 10th October 2007,
Lucas Rocha
- Statement about OOXML,
Richard Stallman
- GNOME Foundation Elections 2007. Let's start the debate!,
Bruno Boaventura
- Final List of Candidates Running for the 2007 Elections,
Baris Cicek
- Re: [Candidacy] Thomas Thurman,
Thomas Thurman
- Re: Candidacy Announcement: Luis Villa,
Luis Villa
- Candidacy Statement: Behdad Esfahbod,
Behdad Esfahbod
- Candidacy Announcement for the 2007 GNOME Board Election: Brian Cameron,
Brian Cameron
- Candidacy: Diego Escalante Urrelo,
Diego Escalante Urrelo
- [Candidacy] John (J5) Palmieri,
John (J5) Palmieri
- Re: Candidacy Announcement for the 2007 GNOME Board Election: George Kraft,
Behdad Esfahbod
- Re: Candidacy: Jeff Waugh,
Andrew Cowie
- Reminder for prospective candidates of BoD 2007,
Baris Cicek
- The problem on the foundation front page,
Sergey Udaltsov
- GUADEC 2008 dates?,
Andrew Cowie
- iCal Calendar for 2007 Board of Directors Election,
Fernando San Martín Woerner
- KDE's rebuke to OOXML,
Richard Stallman
- FOSDEM '08,
Philip Van Hoof
- clarification and apology [was Re: board],
Luis Villa
- academic cooperation,
Dr. Michael J. Chudobiak
- Statement on OOXML,
Richard Stallman
- Re: no financial statements for recent years on Foundation website,
Vincent Untz
- Help us prepare a budget for 2008!,
Vincent Untz
- About the coming election,
Anne Østergaard
- Re: About the coming election,
Diego Escalante Urrelo
- Re: About the coming election,
Behdad Esfahbod
- Re: About the coming election,
Sankarshan Mukhopadhyay
- Who would be a good member? [Was: About the coming election],
Jeff Waugh
- Re: Who would be a good member? [Was: About the coming election],
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra
- Re: Who would be a good member? [Was: About the coming election],
Sankarshan Mukhopadhyay
- Re: Who would be a good member? [Was: About the coming election],
Jeff Waugh
- Re: Who would be a good member? [Was: About the coming election],
Richard Stallman
- Re: Who would be a good member? [Was: About the coming election],
Dr. Michael J. Chudobiak
- Re: Who would be a good member? [Was: About the coming election],
BJörn Lindqvist
- Re: Who would be a good member? [Was: About the coming election],
Quim Gil
- Re: Who would be a good member? [Was: About the coming election],
Vincent Untz
- Re: Who would be a good member? [Was: About the coming election],
Jeff Waugh
- Re: About the coming election,
Bruno Boaventura
- bounties?,
Dr. Michael J. Chudobiak
- Re: bounties?,
Jeff Waugh
- Re: bounties?,
Dr. Michael J. Chudobiak
- Re: bounties?,
Quim Gil
- Re: bounties?,
Behdad Esfahbod
- Re: bounties?,
Richard Stallman
- Re: bounties?,
Tristan Van Berkom
- Re: bounties?,
Dr. Michael J. Chudobiak
- Re: bounties?,
Kevin Kubasik
- Re: bounties?,
Dr. Michael J. Chudobiak
- Re: bounties?,
Tristan Van Berkom
- Re: bounties?,
Richard Stallman
- Re: bounties?,
Tristan Van Berkom
- Re: bounties?,
Johannes Schmid
- Re: bounties?,
Kevin Kubasik
- Re: bounties?,
Liam R E Quin
- Re: bounties?,
Kevin Kubasik
- Re: bounties?,
Behdad Esfahbod
- Re: bounties?,
Dr. Michael J. Chudobiak
- Re: bounties?,
Johannes Schmid
- Re: bounties?,
Dave Neary
- Re: bounties?,
Behdad Esfahbod
- Re: bounties?,
Calum Benson
- Announcement of 2007 Board of Directors Election,
Baris Cicek
- Re: board [was Re: OOXML [was Re: GNOME Foundation Board Meeting Minutes :: 7/6/07]],
Luis Villa
- Re: OOXML [was Re: GNOME Foundation Board Meeting Minutes :: 7/6/07],
Richard Stallman
Mail converted by MHonArc