On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 11:15 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 16:09 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > > On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 18:42 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > > And there are probably an equal number who believe the contrary, like > > > me, but let's not argue about it. I think Paul's suggestion that the > > > default behaviour for "Reply Publicly" be configurable in a similar way > > > to Forward is a good solution here. > > > > How's this? I think the list ate my reply with the image attachment -- just as well I Cc'd you directly. :) For the record, it was: http://david.woodhou.se/evo-group-reply.png > Very nice. This would fit well with my recent (second revised) proposal > in place of the Reply To List button. > > I feel we're approaching a consensus. Let's hope it isn't asymptotic :-) OK, I've pushed what I have so far, since I think we're fairly much agreed. There may be more tweaks we can make, but this is progress. What I've pushed is: - Three nag pop-ups: - Replying to all, to many (15+) recipients - Replying privately to list mail - Mailing list is hijacking private mail with Reply-To: - Option to ignore Reply-To: where it matches List-Post: - 'Group Reply' button with drop-down menu like the 'Forward' one, with its default action configurable for list/all. - Memory leak fixes (which I need to back port to gnome-2-30)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
