Re: [Evolution] Reply for list messages should go back to the list

I like your picture, I think that way is fine to me.


El jue, 15-07-2010 a las 16:57 +0100, David Woodhouse escribió:
On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 11:15 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 16:09 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 18:42 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > > And there are probably an equal number who believe the contrary, like
> > > me, but let's not argue about it. I think Paul's suggestion that the
> > > default behaviour for "Reply Publicly" be configurable in a similar way
> > > to Forward is a good solution here. 
> > 
> > How's this?

I think the list ate my reply with the image attachment -- just as well
I Cc'd you directly. :)

For the record, it was:

> Very nice. This would fit well with my recent (second revised) proposal
> in place of the Reply To List button.
> I feel we're approaching a consensus. Let's hope it isn't asymptotic :-)

OK, I've pushed what I have so far, since I think we're fairly much
agreed. There may be more tweaks we can make, but this is progress.

What I've pushed is:

 - Three nag pop-ups:
	- Replying to all, to many (15+) recipients
	- Replying privately to list mail
	- Mailing list is hijacking private mail with Reply-To:

 - Option to ignore Reply-To: where it matches List-Post:

 - 'Group Reply' button with drop-down menu like the 'Forward' one,
   with its default action configurable for list/all.

 - Memory leak fixes (which I need to back port to gnome-2-30)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]