Re: [Evolution] Evolution/GPG



Am Sonntag, den 21.02.2016, 12:37 +0100 schrieb Stig Roar Wangberg: 
su. den 21. 02. 2016 klokka 00.54 (+0000) skreiv Patrick O'Callaghan:
On Sun, 2016-02-21 at 01:47 +0100, Stig Roar Wangberg wrote:
And thanks, by the way, for your answers and help. I've learned a lot
since I got here. 

No problem.

Note that it's also good practice to quote only the parts of the
message you are commenting on, and not keep an ever-increasing sausage
of quotes nested in quotes nested ...

Cheers

poc

Good point! Sure thing! Thanks again! 

Stig

For me, Stig's signature now (after gpg --recv-keys 7C174863) appears as
follows:

gpg: ASCII-Hülle: Version: GnuPG v1
gpg: Unterschrift vom So 21 Feb 2016 12:37:17 CET mittels RSA-Schlüssel
ID 7C174863
gpg: verwende Vertrauensmodell PGP
gpg: Korrekte Unterschrift von »Stig Roar Wangberg
<srw openmailbox org>«
gpg:                 alias "Stig Roar Wangberg <srwangberg hotmail com>"
gpg: WARNUNG: Dieser Schlüssel trägt keine vertrauenswürdige Signatur!
gpg:          Es gibt keinen Hinweis, daß die Signatur wirklich dem
vorgeblichen Besitzer gehört.
Haupt-Fingerabdruck  = D1AA 5023 275C 4FAC 7EF5  076B 20AD 6E59 7C17
4863
gpg: Binäre Unterschrift, Hashmethode "SHA256"

what could sound like

gpg: Signature 21 February 2016 12:37: 17 CET using RSA key ID 7C174863
gpg: use trust model PGP
gpg: Correct signature of “Stig Roar Wangberg < srw openmailbox org > “
gpg:               alias “Stig Roar Wangberg < srwangberg hotmail com >”
gpg: WARNING: This key does not carry a trustworthy signature!
gpg:          There is no reference that the signature really belongs to
the alleged owner.
Main fingerprint = D1AA 5023 275C 4FAC 7EF5 076B 20AD 6E59 7C17 4863
gpg: binary signature, hash method “SHA256”

Just for the files: What more would I do to see Stig's signature as
valid for further mails ?
-- 
Tom <tom prost-net de>
ProstNet - Tom



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]