Re: [Evolution] Evolution/GPG

[Pete Biggs <pete biggs org uk>]

> Â 
>
> It puzzles me though, that after converting from SHA-1 to SHA-256,
> Evolution still uses SHA-1. What can be the reason for that, you think?
No it's not, your messages are signed using a SHA256 digest. Â At the
bottom of a signed/encrypted message in Evolution you will see a
coloured bar showing the PGP status - green if everything is OK, yellow
if valid but not verifiable and red if something wrong. Â Clicking on
the icon at the far left end of the bar will give you more information.
The message I'm replying to says:

    gpg: armor header: Version: GnuPG v1
    gpg: Signature made Mon 08 Feb 2016 08:48:43 GMT using RSA key ID 7C174863
    gpg: using PGP trust model
    gpg: Good signature from "Stig Roar Wangberg <    srwangberg hotmail com    >" [unknown]
    gpg:Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â aka "Stig Roar Wangberg <    srw openmailbox org    >" [unknown]
    gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
    gpg:Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner.
    Primary key fingerprint: D1AA 5023 275C 4FAC 7EF5Â Â 076B 20AD 6E59 7C17 4863
    gpg: binary signature, digest algorithm SHA256, key algorithm rsa4096

Why do you think it's using SAH-1?

P.