Re: [Evolution] Evolution/GPG



Am Samstag, den 20.02.2016, 16:56 +0100 schrieb Stig Roar Wangberg:
to. den 11. 02. 2016 klokka 18.39 (+0000) skreiv Pete Biggs:
What about this, then? Does this say anything about why there's always
two .dat-files attached together with the encrypted attachment?

--=-FBjrxYQ2/8R5tscH+TLU
Content-Type: application/pgp-encrypted; name="dat.asc"
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="dat.asc"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64

And if so, what does it tell me?


As the "Content-Type:" says, that's the PGP encrypted attachment.

I don't know why there are two .dat files.

If you want, forward the mail (as an attachment) to me and I'll have a
look at it.  But it won't be immediately.

P.

Everything is working just fine now! I'm very pleased with Evolution.
But what does it mean when it says that the signature is valid, but
cannot confirm the sender (I don't know the exact wording in English)? 

I think it is the same what I see here:
Signatur existiert, jedoch wird der öffentliche Schlüssel benötigt.
or
gpg: Signatur am Sa 20 Feb 2016 16:56:34 CET mit RSA Schlüssel, ID
7C174863, erfolgt.
gpg: Unterschrift kann nicht geprüft werden: Öffentlicher Schlüssel
nicht gefunden.

I haven't checked the English UI but it could there sound like:
Signature exists but the public key however is needed/required. 
or
gpg: Signature at the Sa 20 Feb 2016 16:56:34 CET with RSA key, ID
7C174863, is carried out. 
gpg: Signature cannot be checked: Public key not found.




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]