Re: [Evolution] Evolution/GPG

[Tom <tom prost-net de>]

Am Samstag, den 20.02.2016, 21:59 +0100 schrieb Stig Roar Wangberg:
(...) 
> > > -- 
> > > Rudolf Künzli - rudolf kunzli gmail comSkype: rudolf.kunzli
> >
> >
> > Your signature looks like this:
> >
> > gpg: armor header: Version: GnuPG v1
> > gpg: Signature made la. 20. feb. 2016 kl. 21.41 +0100 CET using RSA key
> > ID 0D20E541
> > gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found
>
>
> Mine looks like this:
>
> gpg: armor header: Version: GnuPG v1
> gpg: Signature made la. 20. feb. 2016 kl. 21.55 +0100 CET using RSA key
> ID 7C174863
> gpg: using PGP trust model

Ah, I see here, you're using a web of trust concept in GnuPG to
establish the authenticity of the binding between a public key and its
owner. Its decentralized trust model is an alternative to the
centralized trust model of a public key infrastructure (PKI), what I was
thinking of the whole time. Sorry for that ...

> gpg: Good signature from "Stig Roar Wangberg <srw openmailbox org>"
> gpg: binary signature, digest algorithm SHA256
>
> Probably 'cause it's signed and trusted. And probably yours would look
> like that to me too, if I were to sign and trust your key.