Re: [Banshee-List] Re move the video portion of Banshee?

[tretle <tretle gmail com>]

Whats counter productive is continuing on in this conversation..
All the relevant points have been made, so there is no need for petty
arguments.


comomolo wrote:
> 
> 
> Wouter Bolsterlee wrote:
>> 
>> No, but neither is your attitude in this thread. Very counterproductive.
>> 
> 
> How exactly? Where are my insults and despise for others?
> 
> 
> Wouter Bolsterlee wrote:
>> 
>>> [...] I'll probably finally be forced to leave and I am very sorry for
>>> that. It was a nice design.
>> 
>> If the attitude you've shown in this thread is indeed the way you want to
>> participate in OSS development, I doubt your contributions will be
>> appreciated at all. You have raised some valid points (those are more
>> than
>> welcome, don't get me wrong), and people have suggested filing
>> enhancement
>> requests for the issues you mentioned. You failed to do that and
>> continued
>> ranting instead. Not very tactful. Not very sweet.
>> 
> Again: where's the rant? Where the lack of tact? 
> 
> If "OSS development" is so picky about criticism then no, I don't really
> want to participate. All I've said is that I don't want a swiss-knife
> tool, that I find it a poor design model and if it's definitely settling
> as the Banshee's design model I'll look for another tool, which is only
> logical.
> 
> I think the point is made and there's no real need for further discussion,
> but let me insist: it *was* a great design.
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Remove-the-video-portion-of-Banshee--tp20512422p20708578.html
Sent from the Banshee mailing list archive at Nabble.com.