Re: [Gimp-developer] present xcf as what it is, a gimp project file format

[gg <gg catking net>]

On 06/16/12 23:51, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
> Logic? Awesome joke, gg.

What's the joke? You think it is fine to adopt contrary positions as it 
suits you and go "there I win". Perhaps there is a different idea of 
humour in your country.

> You are basically saying that professionals don't make mistakes, and
> if they do, it's all right, they don't fret. This is just silly.


> First of all, everyone makes mistakes, professionals are not robots.
> But this is not the point.


I never said "they don't fret" I said they are big enough to know what a 
png is and if they make a mistake they assume the responsibility.


> The point is that saving means being able to have access to all the
> project/work data in the future. This has been stated millions of
> times,

No, if I open a png to edit it, save means save my png.

The current attempt to redefine that is what a lot of people are trying 
to discuss.

Stating outright the "save now mean use xcf" and there fore I am right 
is more of your personal logic.

> and the fact that you keep going on and on about this can only
> mean that you are trying to be a pain in the arse.

No the fact that I "keep going on about it" means the software is 
becoming a PITA and I wish to help improve it.

I started this thread with a cogent , concrete suggestion about what was 
causing conflict in the GUI  and suggested a possible approach to making 
it suit both extended and short term processing in a coherent way.

So far I have Peter intent on throwing up all sorts of issues that were 
not related to what I said and your illogical and now insulting behaviour.

That is a fairly good indication that neither of you have anything to 
say other than "I know best and that's as far as it goes".

 Impressive guys.