Re: [Evolution] Annoyance with "next message" order

[Milan Crha <mcrha redhat com>]

On Fri, 2015-03-20 at 16:30 +0000, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> IMHO the ordering should take into account messages deleted but not
> expunged, such that merely deleting a message should not reorder
> anything.

        Hi,
it currently sorts only messages you see. Deleted (or Junk) messages 
are skipped by default for regular folders (not Trash/not Junk 
folders).

Paul's case shows that he deleted root of the thread, which means that 
either the indirect artificial thread root will be picked (as I 
mentioned in the other mail in this thread), or the both subthreads 
should be left as new roots of the threads and be made one thread only 
after the view is regenerated. Such behavior might be hard to get 
right, I think.
        Bye,
        Milan