Re: Translations of folder names - re-hiding special directories
- From: Gábor Farkas <gabor z10n net>
- To: Ryan McDougall <NQG24419 nifty com>
- Cc: Alan Cox <alan lxorguk ukuu org uk>, Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>, Alexander Larsson <alexl redhat com>, desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Translations of folder names - re-hiding special directories
- Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 15:05:04 +0100
Ryan McDougall wrote:
1. Firstly I want to state that I'm not trying to only think of shell
users/programmers. We *should* try to make the GUI work without the
shell, but that doesn't mean we should ditch the shell (its too damn
useful)!
yes.. and this is somehow a thing that many times the
developers/designers of unix systems forget (just look at how 'fast'
gnome-terminal is)
for example for me (i admit i am a developer) the shell is the most
useful feature in the whole gnome/freedesktop/whatever.
for example, i still challange ANYONE to prove to me, that when
thumbnails are not important (for example, lots of java source code
files), someone is able to (re)organize directories with those files
faster in nautilus than in midnight commander. (i realize that midnight
commander is not really the shell, but still..).
for me the shell was one of the reasons why i switched to linux (unix),
and still is the feature that i miss the most when i have to work with
windows (i don't consider cmd.exe as a usable shell).
many, many, many, many tasks are much easier to do on the command line
than in the gui.
btw. imho the correct solution to this problem is to switch someting
like storage. or at least something like this:
http://ozy.student.utwente.nl/projects/dbfs .
why are we trying to make the filesystem into something that he is not?
gabor
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]