Yo! Mmm sorry if I'm too critical. On Sat, 2006-11-25 at 03:24 -0500, Máirín Duffy wrote: > http://mihmo.livejournal.com/34329.html In brief, why don't you make a wgo navigation bar with a primary and secondary level in a single piece? In the line suggested by this guy in your blog: http://img242.imageshack.us/img242/1899/wgojcooperql2.png Primary+secondary integrated is the normal approach. There is no reason to separate/disintegrate them, it looks confusing, make Joachim say it doesn't work and we loose vertical space for content. This is why I dislike the banner-bar approach. I understand people caring about visuals like the mockup but... in real web pages we might be wasting a 1/3 of the vertical space available in the browser with the megaheader. On the other hand, there is no need for a breadcrumb navigation: the wgo navigation should be enough to tell you where are you. I think that applying your good interface design skills to the structure suggested at http://img242.imageshack.us/img242/1899/wgojcooperql2.png will bring the definitive header. > I really like the color differentiation idea! One think that we have overklooked until now is that the General top nav bar should reflect in which subsite are we now - like nav bars tend to do. This means that wgo would have the foot-home tab on the left in a different treatment, or art.gnome.org would have the "Art" tab with a different treatment. Perhaps we could do this coloring the tab with the same color of the header, instead of the default black. > Ah ok. I've been working with thos on how art.gnome.org might use this > design and when you folks feel you have enough from me for this release, Cool! Of course we want that the wgo works help improving the rest opf GNOME subsites. -- Quim Gil /// http://desdeamericaconamor.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
