[wgo] XHTML1.0 Strict vs HTML 4.01



Another concern about the *HTML* encoding to be used in wgo:

RickyZhou says at http://live.gnome.org/GnomeWeb/WebPolicies

"It isn't practical to require XHTML, since it would have to be sent as
text/html to support IE. In doing so, it becomes impossible to take
advantage of its features, as all browsers would simply render it as
malformed HTML. Overall, I recommend HTML 4.01 Strict for maximal
support. Some links that explain this debate in more detail:
http://www.hixie.ch/advocacy/xhtml and
http://www.webstandards.org/learn/articles/askw3c/sep2003/ "

Opinions?

-- 
Quim Gil /// http://desdeamericaconamor.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]