Re: Perl Packages [was: Re: GNOME Bugzilla Upgrade: Test Upgrade On Friday?]
- From: Olav Vitters <olav bkor dhs org>
- To: Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com>
- Cc: gnome-infrastructure gnome org
- Subject: Re: Perl Packages [was: Re: GNOME Bugzilla Upgrade: Test Upgrade On Friday?]
- Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 09:00:24 +0200
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 04:42:42PM -0400, Owen Taylor wrote:
> What might make sense is to make RPMForge our canonical repo for perl,
> and add to epel.repo:
>
> exclude=perl-*
>
> I don't think it makes sense to do things differently across the
> different servers, so what I'm thinking of is:
>
> Base RHEL repository: protected
> EPEL: protected, exclude=perl-*
> RPMForge: not protected, include=perl-*
Agree with above.
Note: I found protectbase not to work for the base RHEL repos. Needed to
modify some file. The rhn-protectbase plugin is on menubar.
> (So, perl packages actually in RHEL are still protected and won't be
> upgraded; that can be relaxed if necessary.)
>
> One thing that we have to be careful about with this is that when label
> is added to puppet, then all the custom Perl packages to it will be
> upgraded to the RPMForge versions. AFAIK, none of the other systems have
> any significant Perl services running on them. Maybe we just hold off on
> puppet-managing label until we have bugzilla migrated over.
RT3 is Perl heavy (window), so was amavis IIRC (menubar)
--
Regards,
Olav
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]