Re: Bug #115289

[Kjartan Maraas <kmaraas broadpark no>]

tir, 26.08.2003 kl. 22.21 skrev Christian Rose:
> tis 2003-08-26 klockan 22.04 skrev Abel Cheung:
> > Yes I forgot to answer that.
> > 
> > This change, IMO, is more a UI bug fix that needs both developers and
> > translators to fix, rather than just randomly adding/changing stuff.
> 
> If it's also a UI change then it breaks the UI freeze as well, and needs
> the approval of the release team as well. We also have a code freeze
> now, so it also breaks that freeze as well. It breaks every damn freeze
> we have.
> 
> AFAIK the release team has *NOT* given their approval for this, so I
> don't even understand why we're debating this.
> 
> Kjartan of course might disagree with my opinion, in that case so be it,

Hmm. Disagreeing once doesn't mean that we can never agree on later
issues I hope. I've been looking at the bug mentioned in the subject and
I agree it's a change that's too big for 2.4.x.

> but I remain utterly convinced that adding hundreds of messages to GNOME
> 2.4 at this point in time, or even after 2.4.0 is released, is a bad
> idea, for the same reasons as why we delayed the intltoolizing of most
> schemas files from the GNOME 2.2 string freeze period until GNOME 2.3.
> 
Yeah, I'd say it's too late for this for 2.4.x. Better to speed up the
process of getting 2.6.x out IMO.

Cheers
Kjartan