Re: no external panels for gnome-control-center [was GNOME Feature Proposal: Backup]
- From: Matthias Clasen <matthias clasen gmail com>
- To: Luca Ferretti <lferrett gnome org>
- Cc: Sergey Udaltsov <sergey udaltsov gmail com>, desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: no external panels for gnome-control-center [was GNOME Feature Proposal: Backup]
- Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 20:34:28 -0400
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 8:00 PM, Luca Ferretti <lferrett gnome org> wrote:
> Il giorno gio, 12/05/2011 alle 19.12 -0400, Matthias Clasen ha scritto:
>
>
> BTW "pet project"... IMHO "pet" is something that plays down the merits,
> isn't it?
Yeah, a little. Sorry.
What I wanted to allude to with the term 'pet' is that third-party
panels tend to focus on the narrow needs of the project they belong
to, and expose a lot of special purpose options that seem important to
the developers who are deeply involved in that project.
Some examples of this that we've already seen are:
- color management (do you know what a perceptual rendering intent is ?)
- kerberos tickets (would you know whether to request a proxiable or a
forwardable ticket ?)
When looking at it from the whole-desktop perspective, many of those
options are typically better off in the special-purpose app than in
the panel, while the few relevant options might better be located in
another, already-existing panel. Figuring this out is hard, and
involves talking to designers; it will only happen if we put a hurdle
that forces people to do it.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]