Re: no external panels for gnome-control-center [was GNOME Feature Proposal: Backup]
- From: Luca Ferretti <lferrett gnome org>
- To: David Zeuthen <zeuthen gmail com>
- Cc: Sergey Udaltsov <sergey udaltsov gmail com>, desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: no external panels for gnome-control-center [was GNOME Feature Proposal: Backup]
- Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 00:34:59 +0200
Il giorno gio, 12/05/2011 alle 18.14 -0400, David Zeuthen ha scritto:
> > So? Why this should be a failure?
>
> Because the premise of System Settings in GNOME 3 is,
> surprisingly, to change your system settings or personalize the
> experience.
So, are there no system settings or personalizations other then the ones
provided by GNOME? 6.x billions of people and only ten (or so) settings
panel?
> We should strive to make this as easy as possible and having 20
> panels such as "Java Settings" or "HTTPD Control" or even "Firewall"
> is something that gets in the way. So if we allowed 3rd party panels,
> it would be a failure because trusting that people won't write broken
> panels like the ones mentioned above is, unfortunately, very naive.
Wait: first, it's GNOME3, not GNOME2, you can't provide a new panel
simply adding a .desktop file with proper keys. You have to develop it
using proper API. This is a first barrier for broken stuff.
Second: are we a censorship? are we fighting against the ugly? are all
non-gnome developers odd and stupid?
It seems your starting point is: everybody's wrong, but not GNOME
people. I feel it really offensive and counterproductive for GNOME
project itself.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]