Re: GNOME Moduleset Reorganization vs. L10N



On Fri, 2010-10-15 at 22:15 +0200, Claude Paroz wrote:
> Le vendredi 15 octobre 2010 à 13:29 -0500, Diego Escalante Urrelo a
> écrit :
> > El vie, 15-10-2010 a las 08:29 -0700, Sandy Armstrong escribió:
> > > 
> > > I'm not a fan myself, but I can see how once a project was already
> > > hooked on a Launchpad-oriented process, it would be work to migrate to
> > > GNOME infrastructure.
> > > 
> > 
> > Agree, how could we shorten that difference? I think this is the real
> > issue, at least for this part of the proposal.
> 
> We are already rich: We have the bug tracker (bugzilla), we have the VCS
> (Git/cgit), we have translation stats (D-L), we have build bots, we have
> a documentation library, an FTP server, ...
> 
> What's missing IMHO is some glue which could integrate those various
> quality  components in a comprehensive Web platform.
> Well, if I'm relieved from D-L, I might look one day into this :-)

do you mean, to have all those services on the project pages, instead
each of it on it's own subdomain? if so, maybe it is worth a try to
integrate it.

>  
> But we are digressing from the initial thread.
> 
> Claude
> -- 
> www.2xlibre.net
> 
> _______________________________________________
> desktop-devel-list mailing list
> desktop-devel-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list

-- 
this mail was sent using 100% recycled electrons
================================================
daniel g. siegel <dgsiegel gnome org>
http://www.dgsiegel.net
gnupg key id: 0x6EEC9E62
fingerprint: DE5B 1F64 9034 1FB6 E120 DE10 268D AFD5 6EEC 9E62
encrypted email preferred

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]