Re: GNOME Moduleset Reorganization vs. L10N
- From: Dimitris Glezos <glezos indifex com>
- To: Johannes Schmid <jhs jsschmid de>
- Cc: desktop-devel-list <desktop-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: GNOME Moduleset Reorganization vs. L10N
- Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 12:59:14 +0300
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 12:42 PM, Johannes Schmid <jhs jsschmid de> wrote:
>> Starting from 1.0, Transifex no longer forces commits to VCS. Yay. :-)
>
> We want forced commits! We don't want people to care about translations
> unless they are translators because we found out in the past that some
> won't care.
>
> If the maintainer has to commit translations manually - that's a pain!
Yeah, this is a common challenge with maintainers. =)
The command-line tool can be quite flexible though. Here are some
proposed workflows:
1. Language leaders can run something like `tx pull --release
gnome/3-0 --language pt_BR` and mass-commit their language before the
translation deadline, for example.
2. Developers can put into their 'make release' Makefule rule the `tx
pull` command, which exports all translation files from Tx.
3. We can easily setup a script to do all these in a batch mode once
per day, or even dynamically using a web hook.
-d
--
Dimitris Glezos
Transifex: The Multilingual Publishing Revolution
http://www.transifex.net/ -- http://www.indifex.com/
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]