On Sat, 2010-10-16 at 03:05 +0200, Kenneth Nielsen wrote: > 2010/10/15 daniel g. siegel <dgsiegel gnome org>: > > On Fri, 2010-10-15 at 16:47 +0200, Johannes Schmid wrote: > >> Hi! > >> > >> > As much as I'd like to claim it, I don't think we can achieve > >> > everything with a single shot. :-) Maintainers of GNOME modules hosted > >> > outside of git.gnome.org don't always feel comfortable with raw > >> > commits to their VCS (security, noise in the vcs history etc). Whether > >> > translations should be committed directly to a repo is a big > >> > discussion, and I believe maintainers are the ones with the final word > >> > on this. > >> > >> Well, we are currently defining the requirements for modules not hosted > >> on git.gnome.org (if we allow them at all). If people are so keen on not > >> hosting on git.gnome.org they will probably have to allow automatic > >> commits. > > > > it would be interesting to know _why_ some modules do not like to be > > hosted on gnome.org. knowing that would make it so much easier to find > > the best way for all of us. > > > > daniel > > In the case of clutter core, which I believe was the module that got > this discussion started again, Emmanuele said the following: > > "now, how do we go from here to there is probably worth discussing. I > cannot move Clutter to gnome.org; it's simply unfeasible for various > reasons, one of which is that the Clutter Project is not just used by > GNOME. this is similar to GStreamer, or Cairo, which are hosted on > freedesktop.org." > > I think especially the, "is not just used by GNOME", argument will be > difficult to circumvent. right, but in that case there is no problem to have it hosted on freedesktop.org, like many other dependencies of gnome. > > Regards Kenneth > > >> Anyway, just everybody following the thread: We haven't yet decided if > >> we move to something different than damned-lies or allow non > >> git.gnome.org modules at all! We are just discussing how everything > >> could look like. > >> > >> Regards, > >> Johannes > >> _______________________________________________ > >> gnome-i18n mailing list > >> gnome-i18n gnome org > >> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n > > > > -- > > this mail was sent using 100% recycled electrons > > ================================================ > > daniel g. siegel <dgsiegel gnome org> > > http://www.dgsiegel.net > > gnupg key id: 0x6EEC9E62 > > fingerprint: DE5B 1F64 9034 1FB6 E120 DE10 268D AFD5 6EEC 9E62 > > encrypted email preferred > > > > _______________________________________________ > > desktop-devel-list mailing list > > desktop-devel-list gnome org > > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list > > > _______________________________________________ > desktop-devel-list mailing list > desktop-devel-list gnome org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list -- this mail was sent using 100% recycled electrons ================================================ daniel g. siegel <dgsiegel gnome org> http://www.dgsiegel.net gnupg key id: 0x6EEC9E62 fingerprint: DE5B 1F64 9034 1FB6 E120 DE10 268D AFD5 6EEC 9E62 encrypted email preferred
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part