On Fri, 2010-10-15 at 16:47 +0200, Johannes Schmid wrote: > Hi! > > > As much as I'd like to claim it, I don't think we can achieve > > everything with a single shot. :-) Maintainers of GNOME modules hosted > > outside of git.gnome.org don't always feel comfortable with raw > > commits to their VCS (security, noise in the vcs history etc). Whether > > translations should be committed directly to a repo is a big > > discussion, and I believe maintainers are the ones with the final word > > on this. > > Well, we are currently defining the requirements for modules not hosted > on git.gnome.org (if we allow them at all). If people are so keen on not > hosting on git.gnome.org they will probably have to allow automatic > commits. it would be interesting to know _why_ some modules do not like to be hosted on gnome.org. knowing that would make it so much easier to find the best way for all of us. daniel > > Anyway, just everybody following the thread: We haven't yet decided if > we move to something different than damned-lies or allow non > git.gnome.org modules at all! We are just discussing how everything > could look like. > > Regards, > Johannes > _______________________________________________ > gnome-i18n mailing list > gnome-i18n gnome org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n -- this mail was sent using 100% recycled electrons ================================================ daniel g. siegel <dgsiegel gnome org> http://www.dgsiegel.net gnupg key id: 0x6EEC9E62 fingerprint: DE5B 1F64 9034 1FB6 E120 DE10 268D AFD5 6EEC 9E62 encrypted email preferred
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part