Re: GNOME Moduleset Reorganization vs. L10N

[Dimitris Glezos <glezos indifex com>]

On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 11:14 AM, Kenneth Nielsen <k nielsen81 gmail com> wrote:
> 2010/10/12 Johannes Schmid <jhs jsschmid de>:
>> After some thinking transiflex really looks like a nice solution. I
>> mean, damned-lies is cool but it adds a lot of maintaince work (for
>> Claude).
>>
>> Could we install our own transiflex instance on our infrastructure, e.g.
>> have transiflex.gnome.org or something like that? Can it be integrated
>> with our LDAP server? Can transiflex commit automatically to
>> git.gnome.org once we sorted the security things out?
>
> We are getting off topic here. The problem at hand is how to handle
> projects that will/can not have their code hosted on gnome servers,
> settings up an gnome instance of transifex will not solve that.

I suspect a GNOME instance of Transifex will solve this, as long as
the upstream maintainer chooses to use GTP instead of another
translation community. What are our main problems for projects not
hosted on GNOME servers?

-d


-- 
Dimitris Glezos

Transifex: The Multilingual Publishing Revolution
http://www.transifex.net/ -- http://www.indifex.com/