Re: [xml] Availability of libxm2-2.9.0 release candidate 1

[Daniel Veillard <veillard redhat com>]

On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 05:33:17PM -0400, Daniel Richard G. wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Aug 2012, Daniel Veillard wrote:
>
> > > Is there a reason why libxml2-py.c doesn't go into the
> > > distribution tarball? (It's specified as
> > > nodist_libxml2mod_la_SOURCES in python/Makefile.am.) I didn't
> > > address this earlier, but if the dist were to bundle everything
> > > in $(GENERATED)---and I don't see a reason why not---end users
> > > who download a tarball wouldn't have to generate files at all,
> > > and this kind of problem wouldn't come up in the first place.
> >
> > I'm fine adding it to the tarball if people think it's better for
> > portability !
>
> Okay, I've re-worked python/Makefile.am---see attached.
>
> With this, the makefile bundles all generated files into the
> distribution, so end users building the Python module don't need to
> regenerate any source files.
>
> There's some clean-up in there, too.

  Okay, thanks ! seems to work fine.
My last annoyance ATM with makefiles is devhelp files being rebuilt
systematically, even on a just built tree or if running "make check"

  Any idea what might have introduced this ;-) ?

Daniel

-- 
Daniel Veillard      | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit  http://xmlsoft.org/
daniel veillard com  | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/
http://veillard.com/ | virtualization library  http://libvirt.org/