Re: Rygel/gupnp-dlna missing in new modulesets

[Jens Georg <mail jensge org>]

On Wed, 2011-01-12 at 18:35 +0200, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 6:29 PM, Matthias Clasen
> <matthias clasen gmail com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 9:28 AM, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) <zeenix gmail com> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>   If we are going to re-think and re-design the UI for this in the
> >> near future, I wonder if its better to just pimp-up the current
> >> preferences UI a bit for gnome 3.0 and go with whatever new
> >> design/plan we come-up with in post 3.0 releases?
> >
> > I think it is best to say that sharing will be a 3.2 feature. Thats
> > why rygel was left out of the core moduleset initially. Design needs
> > to come first, instead of just cramming all the stuff we had back in.
> 
>   OK, that would mean that we put it in apps for now?
> 

We might run in a dependency problem there; apps says "Core should be
self-contained". When we add rygel to apps, where does gupnp-dlna go?
I'm asking because gupnp-vala ideally should depend on all gupnp libs it
covers, including gupnp-dlna.