Re: [orca-list] Built in Controls for Espeak Pretty Please with Sugar, cheeries, whatever it takes on top :)
- From: Alex Midence <alex midence gmail com>
- To: Kelly Prescott <kprescott coolip net>, 'Orca-list' <orca-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: [orca-list] Built in Controls for Espeak Pretty Please with Sugar, cheeries, whatever it takes on top :)
- Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 22:33:46 -0500
I rest my case. Beggars can't be choosers, in other words. It is the
blessing and the curse of free/open source software. there's good stuff
out there. If you want a feature to enhance it, be willing to write it
yourself. What's that? Can't write code? Learn to. Can't wrap your
head around it? Not enough time? You're out of luck then. In a
situation like this, the beggars must undergo a metamorphosis and
become the employers. when someone is on your payroll, you can raise
cane and get the feature you want created. You can get the source code,
decide on what specifically needs to happen for your feature to take
shape, come up with funding, hire the best coder for the job who will
take what you are willing to pay and then put them to work.
Incidentally, just as devs write this stuff in their free time, others
write documentation for it, promote it, and provide what amounts to
technical support services in theirs.
On 8/28/2014 4:16 PM, Kelly Prescott wrote:
I don't think there is hostility, rather people have expressed there
interests and lack of interests.
The thing is in a nut shell, this is free software and most of it is
written by people in there spare time.
What I do in my spare time is my business, and what software I write
in my spare time is also my business.
I do not personally think this would be worth my time to write in my
spare time, but If I were hired to do it, I would complete it like any
other job.
Everyone here is free to do the same.
If people want it so bad, then use some of the excellent tutorials on
the net and learn the languages, and API structures and write it.
Alternatively, we could come up with a kickstarter project, and hire
someone to do the write with the agreement to open source the results.
I am not trying to pick on anyone, I am just reminding everyone that
this is free software!
This does not mean free of cost necessarily, rather it means that it
is free to use and change or improve.
On Thu, 28 Aug 2014, Alex Midence wrote:
I must admit that I'm surprised at the level of hostility I have seen
with regard to this idea. In light of it, I honestly think that
nothing short of getting funding and actually hiring somebody to do
it is the only way this will happen. Such a pity. While I think the
idea of speech dispatcher is a good one, unfortunately, all too
often, as Rudyard Kippling would've put it"Desire outruns
performance." When this happens, the user is left in the lurch
completely without speech unless he or she has console speech or
another solution like Emacspeak installed.
-----Original Message-----
From: orca-list [mailto:orca-list-bounces gnome org] On Behalf Of
Storm Dragon
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2014 12:24 AM
To: Orca-list
Subject: Re: [orca-list] Built in Controls for Espeak Pretty Please
with Sugar, cheeries, whatever it takes on top :)
Howdy,
This, like every other issue that is raised here, was only meant to
get a yes or no vote. It shouldn't disintegrate into a
spame/flame/I'm way too busy to care war. Everyone is busy, we all
have lives, and yet, most of us still manage to get things done on
the projects we manage. I'm sure Joanie is very capable of making her
own decisions ragarding what to work on with Orca, and that if this
is something the community wants, as seems to be the case (something
like 5 yes to 2 no so far), she will at least consider it. It is
something I, and several others, really would like, and adding it
would not hurt the project in any way, and would fix a lot of
problems cause due to the lack of speech-dispatcher's abilities.
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 03:02:13PM +1000, Luke Yelavich wrote:
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 01:48:04PM AEST, Storm Dragon wrote:
Howdy,
Nearly every other screen reader has multiple ways to interact with
speech. NVDA has a built in espeak, and the other nonfree readers
have synths as well, I think most have a built in Eloquence. Never
once, have I heard any of those users complain that their screen
reader has entirely too many ways to talk. Also, as far as I am
aware, no one has ever said "Man, I really wish my screen reader
had to jump through layer after layer of junk to speak."
Just because other screen readers interface directly with a speech
synthesizer doesn't mean Orca should. Orca certainly has the
modularity to allow for different speech systems to be supported,
including a direct eSpeak driver, but given speech-dispatcher is the
only TTS backend supported, that may very well change in the future.
Speech-dispatcher is ok, for minimal usage, but it crashes with alsa,
has odd puctuation inconsistancies, and is slow as molasses. The last
time development of speech-dispatcher even reached a snail's pace was
when open-speech or whatever was called was made because people weree
frustrated with the lack of progress made by speech-dispatcher. I'm
not even asking to replace spd. Let the people who like it use it.
That's one thing that makes Linux rock, there's usually more than one
way to do things. for some people, speech-dispatcher may be fine.
for me, it's falling rather short.
Yes, speech-dispatcher has some annoying issues that need
attentionnnnnn. Nobody is denying that, not even me. There are many
things that niggle me about speech-dispatcher too. However I have
not yet been able to find the time and desire to want to sit down
and try and fix them. Perhaps since there are issues with
speech-dispatcher that really annoy you, you could consider getting
involved and help properly identify sed issues, and maybe even fix
them.
Also, with a reliable way to deliver speech, speech-dispatcher can
drag on it its currently abysmally slow progress, and we can have
fully working espeak. Speech-dispatcher has been around and for a
long time now, and there still not full support for espeak... No
way to use variants, and you have to hack it to use freasonably
fast espeak.
The only reason speech-dispatcher's development progress is
abysmally slow is because people cannot currently find the time to
work on it.
For those of you who want a direct eSpeak orca driver, you will
probably have to find someone to write the driver, probably someone
who wants the same thing as you do. I am sure Joanie could, but I
think she has her hands full with more time consuming stuff, such as
keeping up with GNOME's developments, and keeping up with the ever
changing nature of the web and ensuring users have a sane browsing
experience with Firefox.
As for speech-dispatcher, the issues you have raised are well known,
and need to be addressed. When time allows, either myself or someone
else will work on fixing Speech-dispatcher not supporting eSpeak
synth variants, and fixing the ALSA driver. Given I work on
speech-dispatcher in my spare time, and given I also have a life and
interests outside of my full time job, I can give no ETA as to when
these issues will be addressed.
Luke
_______________________________________________
orca-list mailing list
orca-list gnome org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/orca-list
Visit http://live.gnome.org/Orca for more information on Orca.
The manual is at
http://library.gnome.org/users/gnome-access-guide/nightly/ats-2.html
The FAQ is at http://live.gnome.org/Orca/FrequentlyAskedQuestions
Log bugs and feature requests at http://bugzilla.gnome.org Find out how
to help at http://live.gnome.org/Orca/HowCanIHelp
--
Powered by Arch Linux! I am registered Linux user number 508465:
https://linuxcounter.net/user/508465.html
My blog, Thoughts of a Dragon: http://www.stormdragon.tk/ get my
public PGP key: gpg --keyserver wwwkeys.pgp.net --recv-key 43DDC193
How many Internet mail list subscribers does it take to change a
lightbulb? http://goo.gl/eO4PJ "The sound of evil laughter falls
around the world tonight."
DragonForce - through the Fire and Flames
_______________________________________________
orca-list mailing list
orca-list gnome org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/orca-list
Visit http://live.gnome.org/Orca for more information on Orca.
The manual is at
http://library.gnome.org/users/gnome-access-guide/nightly/ats-2.html
The FAQ is at http://live.gnome.org/Orca/FrequentlyAskedQuestions
Log bugs and feature requests at http://bugzilla.gnome.org
Find out how to help at http://live.gnome.org/Orca/HowCanIHelp
_______________________________________________
orca-list mailing list
orca-list gnome org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/orca-list
Visit http://live.gnome.org/Orca for more information on Orca.
The manual is at
http://library.gnome.org/users/gnome-access-guide/nightly/ats-2.html
The FAQ is at http://live.gnome.org/Orca/FrequentlyAskedQuestions
Log bugs and feature requests at http://bugzilla.gnome.org
Find out how to help at http://live.gnome.org/Orca/HowCanIHelp
- References:
- [orca-list] Built in Controls for Espeak Pretty Please with Sugar, cheeries, whatever it takes on top :)
- Re: [orca-list] Built in Controls for Espeak Pretty Please with Sugar, cheeries, whatever it takes on top :)
- Re: [orca-list] Built in Controls for Espeak Pretty Please with Sugar, cheeries, whatever it takes on top :)
- Re: [orca-list] Built in Controls for Espeak Pretty Please with Sugar, cheeries, whatever it takes on top :)
- Re: [orca-list] Built in Controls for Espeak Pretty Please with Sugar, cheeries, whatever it takes on top :)
- Re: [orca-list] Built in Controls for Espeak Pretty Please with Sugar, cheeries, whatever it takes on top :)
- Re: [orca-list] Built in Controls for Espeak Pretty Please with Sugar, cheeries, whatever it takes on top :)
- Re: [orca-list] Built in Controls for Espeak Pretty Please with Sugar, cheeries, whatever it takes on top :)
- Re: [orca-list] Built in Controls for Espeak Pretty Please with Sugar, cheeries, whatever it takes on top :)
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]