On Tue, 2010-02-23 at 11:06 -0600, Paul Cutler wrote: > I think Spider Monkey might be very appropriate for GNOME 3.0 > considering GNOME Shell (and the new user interface) is the highlight > of the GNOME 3.0 release. And it might be a good thing for all our contributors that care about the Amazonian Rain Forest. De-Florestation is the main reason that the Spider Monkey is being threatened. I would suppose many people, specially from South/Central America will be fond of this. To me, brings back the time of the best GNOME distro ever, Ximian GNOME. nm > > Paul > > On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 11:04 AM, Tim Horton <tim hortont com> wrote: > > On Feb 23, 2010, at 12:01, Stormy Peters wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 10:00 AM, Shaun McCance > > <shaunm gnome org> wrote: > > > > I'm totally in favor of Gnome 3.0, the "Spider > > Monkey" release. > > I have never in my life witnessed the Gnome > > community pass up > > a chance to name something after a primate. ;-) > > > > > > The Spider Monkey is also my favorite for much the same > > reason. :) > > > > > Spider Monkey strikes me as an odd release subhead... if only > because the JS engine that powers Mozilla's products, as well > as GJS (and thus, Shell), is called Spidermonkey. > > > (Not sure if this was brought up, I've only skimmed the rest > of this thread) > > > --Tim > > > Stormy > > > > -- > > marketing-list mailing list > > marketing-list gnome org > > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing-list > > > > > > -- > marketing-list mailing list > marketing-list gnome org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing-list > >
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part