En/na Santiago Roza ha escrit: > yes effective advocacy requires knowing your target markets, but > that's a prerequisite for advocacy, not advocacy itself. so if we're > gonna do that in addition to just advocacy, well it won't be just > advocacy. What brings us to the point of... continuing the personas project, which is really interesing and something really new and constructive in our discussions. By defining the personas that matter to us we will be able to understand better the impact of a rant done by Eminence X and the GNOME advocates will be able to tune their advocacy. Recovering an earlier question you made: >> You can help changing this structure and history in >> order to improve them and allow marketing actions like this in a near >> future. > > >and how do you plan to do that, exactly? My contribution to a plan is to help improving the communication infrastructure of the GNOME community, so teams can plan properly with more internal knowledge and more powerful external channels of communication. What upsets you about the response to linus is the fact of GNOME not having a response visible to the public containing an official position signed by the GNOME project and backed by the GNOME community. With the current gnome.org this is pretty difficult, but see in one year time. There are other things that (have) upset you but they are mostly caused for your lack of information about how GNOME works internally. With the current gnome.org this is pretty understandable, but see in six months time. Reading your emails you look like needing to check the gnome-web-list and the foundation-list archives. You seem to be deeply concerned about issues you think that aren't being debated at all, when actually they are being deeply debated there. -- Quim Gil - http://desdeamericaconamor.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature