Re: sloppy->heavy string freeze (was: Typos in eog.schemas.in)

[Tino Meinen <a t meinen chello nl>]

> 	Yeah, redundancy is always good. Pick a number of people on gnome-i18n
> who understand the policy and its implications and bless them as
> approvers. A single approval should probably be enough, though.

With many approvers around, there will always be one that will approve
the string change.
Thus if you have too many approvers, they actually become redundant.

On the other hand, if you make them 'disapprovers'
Then with enough of them around there will alway be one that
disapproves; thus creating a genuine string freeze.

Perhaps with this, we can devise a scheme to introduce a gradual
transition from a sloppy string freeze to a heavy string freeze.

Tino