Re: [Gimp-user] HATE the new save vs. export behavior
- From: Alexandre Prokoudine <alexandre prokoudine gmail com>
- To: gimp-user-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: [Gimp-user] HATE the new save vs. export behavior
- Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2012 03:39:09 +0400
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 3:23 AM, Jay Smith wrote:
In return, I got back a dismissive reply
You didn't :)
that IMHO completely ignored the
intent of what I was trying to say.
If I skip some bits, it doesn't mean that I don't read them or
disagree. It also can mean that I agree and merely reply to the bits
that I disagree or want to clarify (otherwise goddamn long threads get
even longer :)). Which is exactly the case here.
In summary, IF nearly every one of the developers responses included some
version of the following statement, nearly half of your "long threads" would
vanish and life would be good:
"We understand _____ presents a difficult situation for some
users and we regret the impact that this has had on you.
Unfortunately, we had to make difficult choices in the subject
of _______ and the result is that the program will no longer
fit the workflow of some users. We feel that the changes we
have made will be to the benefit of the majority of the user
community and we are dedicated to continuing the improvement
of Gimp for the target user community. We appreciate your
loyalty to Gimp and hope that you will find a way to adjust
your workflows so that Gimp's new behavior will work well
for you. Thank you for expressing your concern. Please know
that we have heard you, even if the changes we have had to make
are not favorable for you, and that we will continue to work
on improving the program to be the best that it can be for
the target user community."
I can use that in the new FAQ with your permission. How about that?
Alexandre Prokoudine
http://libregraphicsworld.org
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]