Re: Can we improve things?


Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
> For my part, if I had anything else to argue it would be that
> p.g.o. should be handled by a formal team whos members could
> be subject to change from time to time (as I suggested before, 
> possibly a marketing team or web team) - as opposed to "add 
> someone else to jeff", which might speed up the process for 
> planet syndication but still risk leaving applicants in the dark
> (and applicants in the dark are the ones I believe might feel
> unwelcome, if only because of the non-democratic nature of
> the process ;-)).

Too much process! The problems are undocumented approval guidelines, and
a single point of failure (Jeff) for planet maintenance. Jeff's fixing
the first one, and a formal team is not an ideal solution to the second.
Keep it simple.


Dave Neary
GNOME Foundation member
bolsh gnome org

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]