On Sun, 2003-09-14 at 06:54, Jeff Waugh wrote: > <quote who="Andreas J. Guelzow"> > > > I may be wrong, but isn't the election committee appointed by the board? > > So, effectively,... > > That's a fairly strong accusation. What accusation? You did remove the reference with respect to which I made this statement, but we were discussing a change in the voting system and I was raising the issue of trust . I had said that the election is effectively supervised by the current powers. That had been denied by a statement that the members of the election committee are on the board. I was pointing out that since they are appointed by the board the power effectively lies with the board. Do not imply that I made accusations against any group when all we are discussing is the potential issues of trust under a proposed change to the board elections. If that change of course gets approved we will probably start to see many real questions and accusations. > Are you unhappy with the current > Elections Committee? > The current election committee operates under transparent election rules and procedures. I have no reason to be unhappy with it. I do have a problem with an attempt to throw a cloak of secrecy over the election. Andreas
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part