Re: On the Interaction with the design team
- From: Frederic Muller <fredm gnome org>
- To: desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: On the Interaction with the design team
- Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2011 10:09:20 +0800
On 06/07/2011 04:53 PM, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
Also, while I'm not a designer, yesterday I wanted to propose some new
stuff, and it was easy to get the design team to find a solution for
proposals (https://live.gnome.org/Design/Proposals ), so from my (short)
experience they seem to be open to listen to new ideas.
Hi!
I don't think the discussion is about the design team not being open but
more about the decision process and understanding how choices are being
made.
I'll take the example of the power off menu. From my discussion with
some members of the design team I have been told the disappearance of
the power off menu was pushed without much discussion just before a
freeze. The current bug has 67 comments
(https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=643457 ) all asking for a
power off menu except 2.
As a foundation member and supporter of GNOME I don't even know myself
how to give a feedback that matters and join the hundreds unhappy
contributors with this decision (users spend hours looking at how they
can power off their machine, talk about good UX...), nor can I point
anyone to a method to give feedback that matters that would help to get
our voice heard.
Were there any UX testing report available that motivated this decision?
Was it really a minority decision? Why? Why can't it be reverted if so?
What is the process?
I am also someone that would be happy to see a trackable system
implemented which we could go back to, read and understand, and provide
meaningful feedback to.
Thank you.
Fred
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]