Re: GNOME 2.26 module inclusion discussion heats up

[Bastien Nocera <hadess hadess net>]

On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 12:10 -0600, Jason D. Clinton wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 8:46 AM, Lennart Poettering <mztabzr 0pointer de> wrote:
> > Oh, is that so?
> >
> > This is some old Topaz mockup:
> >
> > http://farm1.static.flickr.com/20/70003494_668cfdc0dd.jpg
> 
> Your attitude is making it really hard to take sides with PA. Yes,
> it's *the* only way forward at the moment. But you don't need to be a
> dick about it. Why are you (and your supporters) resisting a fall back
> mode so strongly?

I don't support Lennart :)

Because the supporters happen to be people that had to deal with bugs in
the old code, and wrote some of the new one.

Feel free to maintain a separate module with the old code...