Re: [xml] Windows threading issues

[Daniel Veillard <veillard redhat com>]

On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 12:49:24PM +0200, Igor Zlatkovic wrote:
> Daniel Veillard wrote:
> > > > XMLPUBFUN
> > > > int
> > > > XMLCALL
> > > >        xmlSchemaValidateDoc        (xmlSchemaValidCtxtPtr ctxt,
> > > >                                xmlDocPtr instance);
> > >
> > > So I take it you prefer them to be on their own lines and not together on 
> > > one line with the return type?
> >
> >    all on the same line will make alignment of arguments harder, no ?
>
> Nono, only the macros and the return type go to the same line, like this:
>
> XMLPUBFUN int XMLCALL
>          xmlSchemaValidateDoc        (xmlSchemaValidCtxtPtr ctxt,
>                                       xmlDocPtr instance);

  that's fine too :-)

> The function name and the argument list remain untouched. This is similar to 
> what is happening now. When a function name + return type are too long for 
> argument alignment, the two appear on the separate lines, like in the 
> following example from xpathInternals.h:
>
> xmlXPathParserContextPtr
>          xmlXPathNewParserContext    (const xmlChar *str,
>                                       xmlXPathContextPtr ctxt);
>
> After the modification, all functions will look like that, with those macros 
> surrounding the return type. I think it's easier on eyes than spreading all 
> of it across multiple lines.

  okay,

Daniel

-- 
Daniel Veillard      | Red Hat Network https://rhn.redhat.com/
veillard redhat com  | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit  http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/