Re: [Usability]Feedback on GNOME 2
- From: "MArk Finlay" <linuxexpert eircom net>
- To: "Darren Alcorn" <daralc logicillustrated com>, "Jeff Waugh" <jdub perkypants org>
- Cc: "Joshua Adam Ginsberg" <joshg myrealbox com>, "Derek D. Martin" <gnomeuse pizzashack org>, <usability gnome org>
- Subject: Re: [Usability]Feedback on GNOME 2
- Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2002 12:30:16 +0100
> Exactly, Derek and I just want to be able to change what the focus
> behaviour is and move on. Not search all day for how the hell to change
> that. Which is how this whole thread started.
I agree with you on the focus behavior - check out the metacity discussion
on
http://www.gnomesupport.org/forums - a lot of your concerns have been
previously discussed.
Personally i run, and will always run, a patched version of Metcity without
"raise-on-focus".
That small change has made gnome feel REALLY great.
If you want a copy of the source code i used i could upload a tarball for
you somewhere.
As for a lot of your other concerns - try Mandrake - they use a lot less
"genericised" version of
Gnome. Redhat have made their version look a lot like KDE and windows - the
default gnome
is a lot sexier. I would also reccomend getting some nice art etc.. from
art.gnome.org if you want
to give your know that "personal feel".
Please, dont give up on gnome ;) Redhat does not give a very accurate
representation of Gnome 2.0
LAter
MArk
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]