Re: [orca-list] Built in Controls for Espeak Pretty Please with Sugar, cheeries, whatever it takes on top :)



On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 03:02:13PM +1000, Luke Yelavich wrote:
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 01:48:04PM AEST, Storm Dragon wrote:
Howdy,
Nearly every other screen reader has multiple ways to interact with speech. NVDA has a built in espeak, 
and the other nonfree readers have synths as well, I think most have a built in Eloquence. Never once, 
have I heard any of those users complain that their screen reader has entirely too many ways to talk. 
Also, as far as I am aware, no one has ever said "Man, I really wish my screen reader had to jump through 
layer after layer of junk to speak."

Just because other screen readers interface directly with a speech synthesizer doesn't mean Orca should. 
Orca certainly has the modularity to allow for different speech systems to be supported, including a direct 
eSpeak driver, but given speech-dispatcher is the only TTS backend supported, that may very well change in 
the future.

 conversely the fact Orca has only supported speech dispatcher doesn't
 mean that that's the right choice either.  I'm honestly not sure what
 the best path is.

Speech-dispatcher is ok, for minimal usage, but it crashes with alsa, has
odd puctuation inconsistancies, and is slow as molasses. The last time
development of speech-dispatcher even reached a snail's pace was when
open-speech or whatever was called was made because people weree frustrated
with the lack of progress made by speech-dispatcher. I'm not even asking to
replace spd. Let the people who like it use it. That's one thing that makes
Linux rock, there's usually more than one way to do things. for some people,
speech-dispatcher may be fine. for me, it's falling rather short.

Yes, speech-dispatcher has some annoying issues that need attentionnnnnn. Nobody is denying that, not even 
me. There are many things that niggle me about speech-dispatcher too. However I have not yet been able to 
find the time and desire to want to sit down and try and fix them. Perhaps since there are issues with 
speech-dispatcher that really annoy you, you could consider getting involved and help properly identify sed 
issues, and maybe even fix them.

Also, with a reliable way to deliver speech, speech-dispatcher can drag on it its currently abysmally 
slow progress, and we can have fully working espeak. Speech-dispatcher has been around and for a long 
time now, and there still not full support for espeak... No way to use variants, and you have to hack it 
to use freasonably fast espeak.

The only reason speech-dispatcher's development progress is abysmally slow is because people cannot 
currently find the time to work on it.

For those of you who want a direct eSpeak orca driver, you will probably have to find someone to write the 
driver, probably someone who wants the same thing as you do. I am sure Joanie could, but I think she has 
her hands full with more time consuming stuff, such as keeping up with GNOME's developments, and keeping up 
with the ever changing nature of the web and ensuring users have a sane browsing experience with Firefox.

As for speech-dispatcher, the issues you have raised are well known, and need to be addressed. When time 
allows, either myself or someone else will work on fixing Speech-dispatcher not supporting eSpeak synth 
variants, and fixing the ALSA driver. Given I work on speech-dispatcher in my spare time, and given I also 
have a life and interests outside of my full time job, I can give no ETA as to when these issues will be 
addressed.

The espeak synth variants issue is one of the bigger problems with the
speech dispatcher model and I'm not really convinced there's a great
answer.  Speech dispatcher is trying to provide a uniform interface to
synthesizers so its clients don't need to care which one they're talking
to, but synthesizers all have there own different features, so either
speech dispatcher implements some kind of lowest common denominator
which isn't great for advanced clients, or speech dispatcher exposes a
non uniform interface which kind of means it fails at what its trying to
do though it may still be useful enough to be worth having.

Trev


Luke
_______________________________________________
orca-list mailing list
orca-list gnome org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/orca-list
Visit http://live.gnome.org/Orca for more information on Orca.
The manual is at http://library.gnome.org/users/gnome-access-guide/nightly/ats-2.html
The FAQ is at http://live.gnome.org/Orca/FrequentlyAskedQuestions
Log bugs and feature requests at http://bugzilla.gnome.org
Find out how to help at http://live.gnome.org/Orca/HowCanIHelp

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]