Re: Network Manager patched on Ubuntu Karmic 9.10
- From: Dan Williams <dcbw redhat com>
- To: Louigi Verona <louigi verona gmail com>
- Cc: networkmanager-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Network Manager patched on Ubuntu Karmic 9.10
- Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 13:26:30 -0800
On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 00:09 +0300, Louigi Verona wrote:
> This is something I understand completely. But those bugs have been
> reported in great detail with logs and everything in launchpad. If it
> would be helpful I can find them in launchpad and place links here.
> Would it be helpful?
Right, they are reported in Launchpad. Launchpad is not the upstream
bug tracker for NetworkManager. The upstream bug tracker for
NetworkManager is bugzilla.gnome.org.
I will often look at Launchpad bugs when people send me links or
otherwise point me to them, but as Launchpad is not the usptream bug
tracker for NetworkManager, it's not the appropriate place follow up on
generic NM bugs.
Once a bug has been determined to be generic and apply to upstream
NetworkManager (ie, it's not caused by Ubuntu specific patches to
NetworkManager, wpa_supplicant, or the kernel), then the Ubuntu NM
maintainer usually forwards the bug upstream to NM. That way, we don't
further complicate the situation with bugs that are caused by distro
specific (be they Fedora, Ubuntu, Suse, whatever) patches.
Dan
> On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 12:02 AM, Dan Williams <dcbw redhat com>
> wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 00:00 +0300, Louigi Verona wrote:
> > Hey, Dan!
> > Thanks for the advice. I am certainly keen on helping the
> community to
> > solve the problem, but the bug had been reported to
> launchpad with
> > like a dozen duplicates. The daily builds were suggested as
> partial
> > fix but since then I could get no information from anywhere
> and bug
> > reports on launchpad do not seem to be updated anymore. My
> friend was
> > asking me whether he should install Karmic and I couldn't
> say "yes",
> > since if his first GNU/Linux experience would be like that,
> I think
> > this would not be a good thing. So eventually I decided to
> contact
> > this mailing list directly, so that I can get some firsthand
> > information.
> >
> > My dream would be to get a new version of NM. Uninstall this
> one,
> > install this one and have it work normally like it did in
> 9.04 %) All
> > apps get bugs like this one sometimes - I am not
> complaining. I just
> > want to know if something is being done and if yes - when is
> a total
> > fix planned? To me it is a serious blocker.
>
>
> You can't realize that dream until we get some help in
> debugging the
> issue so that we can fix the problem. We also can't do
> anything until
> users help us debug the problem by answering the questions
> that I've
> asked.
>
> Dan
>
>
> > On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 11:49 PM, Dan Williams
> <dcbw redhat com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 2009-11-17 at 09:36 +0000, Cian Masterson
> wrote:
> > > 2009/11/17 Louigi Verona
> <louigi verona gmail com>:
> > > > 2. When I boot the system, NM would try to
> automatically
> > connect to some
> > > > Wired connection lfupdown (eth1). It seems to be
> there by
> > default. Since I
> > > > have no wired connection, it of course, always
> fails. I
> > cannot edit it, the
> > > > Edit button is grayed out when I select this
> connection. I
> > tried making my
> > > > DSL connection automatically connect, but then
> it begins
> > to ask for password
> > > > and says again "Insufficient privileges" and I
> have to
> > start over again. Is
> > > > there any way to remove this default
> non-existing
> > connection?
> > >
> > > This happened to me too, although in my case it
> was
> > "ifupdown (eth3)".
> > > This left my laptop with no network access
> because my wired
> > > connection (which was eth5 in Jaunty) wasn't being
> > recognised. I
> > > tried editing /etc/network/interfaces by hand but
> that
> > didn't work
> > > either. Long story short I
> deleted /etc/network/interfaces,
> > rebooted
> > > the machine and eth5 magically reappeared and
> everything
> > worked fine
> > > after that.
> > >
> > > Better minds than mine will know what actually
> happened but
> > I am
> > > assuming that a missing /etc/network/interfaces
> forced
> > Ubuntu/Network
> > > Manager to re-scan the hardware or something. As
> per usual
> > if you try
> > > this route yourself I recommend
> > moving /etc/network/interfaces to
> > > /etc/network/interfaces.broken or something
> instead of
> > deleting it.
> > > YMMV but this worked for me.
> >
> >
> > If people are running into problems like this on
> Ubuntu, the
> > best thing
> > to do to help debug the issue is to either file a
> bug report
> > in
> > Launchpad, or grab your /var/log/NetworkManager.log
> file, or
> > if that
> > doesn't exist /var/log/daemon.log and send it to
> this list so
> > that we
> > can try to figure out what's going on.
> >
> > Especially int he case of PPPoE/DSL, to debug
> further you can:
> >
> > 1) stop NetworkManager
> > 2) as root, run NetworkManager like this:
> >
> > NM_PPP_DEBUG=1 /usr/sbin/NetworkManager --no-daemon
> >
> > 3) try to reproduce the issue
> > 4) send the NetworkManager debug output to this list
> >
> > Dan
> >
> >
>
>
>
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]