[guadec-list] Registration fees (was Re: Terms and conditions for registration)
- From: Koen Martens <gmc sonologic nl>
- To: guadec-list gnome org
- Subject: [guadec-list] Registration fees (was Re: Terms and conditions for registration)
- Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 12:03:40 +0200
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 11:53:26AM +0200, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
> Indeed, a registration fee itself isn't the big problem. But the concept
> that some sort of high elite price (because that is what €100 and €200
> still is; the European currency hasn't inflated that much yet) must be
> paid "just because <insert a bunch of false-reasons>", is wrong.
Ok, i was going to ignore this thread because there's a lot of FUD and
bikeshedding potential and that's a waste of my time.
But apparently i haven't re-iterated this enough:
- there is NO MANDATORY ENTRANCE FEE!!
- i repeat, THERE IS NO MANDATORY ENTRANCE FEE!!!!!!!!!!!
- there is no formal verification or any need to present proof that
you are not a professional or are a student or whatever, the
fees are a suggestion, and we won't not let you in because you are
a professional but didn't pay
- we count on a very small proportion of the visitors paying the
EUR 100,- or EUR 250,-
- the amount we get with registration fees is expected to cover for
about 15% - 20% of the travel sponsorships, sponsors pay for the
rest
- EUR 100,- is not a lot of money for a 3-day (5-day) conference, i'd
happily pay that (i'm self-employed, and not rich because i'm a
silly idealist who volunteers too much)
- comparing the hague to Istanbul is silly, price levels are very
very different
Gr,
Koen
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]