Re: gtkmm and C++0x

[Alexander Shaduri <ashaduri gmail com>]

On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 22:54:26 +0200
Fabien Parent <parent f gmail com> wrote:

> __cplusplus is not something new from c++0x, it is already there in c++98.
> Here come a quote from the c++ 98 standard paper:
> "_ _cplusplus The name _ _cplusplus is defined to the value 199711L
> when compiling a C++
>    translation unit."
> What I said is still true: gcc doesn't follow the c++98 standard
> closely. At least in gcc 4.4 shipped in debian sid.

There is a 9 year old bug about this:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1773


Alexander