Re: gtkmm and C++0x
- From: Alexander Shaduri <ashaduri gmail com>
- To: Murray Cumming <murrayc openismus com>
- Cc: Chris Vine <chris cvine freeserve co uk>, gtkmm-list <gtkmm-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: gtkmm and C++0x
- Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 12:59:00 +0400
Hello,
On Wed, 31 Mar 2010 08:27:07 +0200
Murray Cumming <murrayc openismus com> wrote:
> As soon as g++ supports a finally-standardized C++0x, I would be happy
> to use it in examples.
Please keep in mind that explicit mentioning of the actual variable types
in documentation / examples actually helped me with my learning process.
Substituting the types with auto may diminish the educational value of
the documentation.
For example,
Gtk::Widget* w = somefunc();
is somewhat self-documenting in a way that we know that somefunc() returns
Gtk::Widget* (or similar).
You can, of course, always mention there that people with C++0x compilers
can use auto instead of the actual type.
Thanks,
Alexander
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]