Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Major ILS change
- From: Damien Sandras <damien sandras it-optics com>
- To: gnomemeeting-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Major ILS change
- Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 11:04:35 +0100
> What about changing GM and ILS so that is shows in the address book that
> the user is not callable? And perahpas in same way indicate a
> firewall/NAT configuration problem.
That was teh first thing I did yesterday, and the listing was awful,
showing about 60% of uncallable users.
We have 2 solutions :
- either we try to have a correct and decent ILS, without porn and with
correctly configured users
- or we let the ILS be populated by misconfigured and unreachable users.
In the latter, I think it denotes a bad quality for the project. What's
the point in giving your phone number if you have no phone?
--
_ Damien Sandras
(o-
//\ It-Optics s.a.
v_/_ GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/
FOSDEM 2004: http://www.fosdem.org
H.323 phone: callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras seconix com
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]