Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Major ILS change
- From: Johnny Strom <jonny strom netikka fi>
- To: gnomemeeting-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Major ILS change
- Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 11:21:26 +0200
Damien Sandras wrote:
Le lun, 15/03/2004 à 09:49 +0200, Johnny Strom a écrit :
Yes that is true, but I don't get so much calls anymore becous of this
and then GM will not be so much tested as before and the quality of GM
might start to drop becous of less testing is done that was the point
I wanted to make.
I agree and disagree. My point here is that users were registering to
ILS, with a broken configuration. They were calling random users,
noticed it was not working and uninstalled GnomeMeeting thinking it was
the program's fault. Now they know their installation is somehow broken
and they can fix it.
I think it was giving a bad reputation to GM to have half of the users
unreachable...
What about changing GM and ILS so that is shows in the address book that
the user is not callable? And perahpas in same way indicate a
firewall/NAT configuration problem.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]