>
> So I tried to get involved today and find tasks that are usefull now,
> but that's really hard. The wiki and bugzilla are really outdated and
> there is no such thing like a gnomeweb-plone-team. I try to talk to the
> people that sprinted in washington in the next days.
>
> To get a better overview and make it easier for others to start I plan
> to do the following things in the next days:
>
> - I'll install a testsite on a public server and update it regulary.
> The easiest way is to install it on my server, but I can install it to
> any server if you want to. The testsite will be up in 1 or 2 days.
> - Then I try to update and extend the tasklist
>
http://live.gnome.org/GnomeWeb/CmsSetup and do some more cleanup in
> the wiki. Many things there are outdated and that makes it difficult
> to get started
> - Work on a repeatable way to fill new sites with conent and
> prepare content
>
> The testsite is basically plone with a basic visual theme. It does not
> hold the content that was in previews testsites. I try to fix that step
> by step. Adapting Plone to the requirements of
gnome.org will take a
> while. Hopefully we can get a handfull of regulary contributing plone
> developers.
> Whenever we have a working state with notable progress I will update the
> testsite.
>
> We will see if gnomeweb-plone makes good progress in the next weeks.
> Setting other deadlines isn't possible in my opinion.
>
>
> Murray Cumming schrieb:
> > On Sat, 2008-10-18 at 19:59 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote:
> >> On Fri, 2008-10-17 at 18:00 -0700, Jonathan Wilde wrote:
>
> [...]
> >>
> >> Which of these are regressions compared to the Plone 2 version that was
> >> running on a test site once? I realise that you'll have to guess the
> >> answer (based on your understanding of Plone 2 & 3) because you probably
> >> never saw that site.
>
> It's a big regression. If I understand it correctly we refactor code
> from late 2007/early 2008. It misses much funktions, design and content
> that I saw in testsites around late2006/early 2007. I also did not find
> an repository with code from 2006/early 2007. If someone has that code,
> it would be a great help. Also having a backup from an old testsite
> would help.
>
> There was activity around PloneSoftwareCenter (DOAP, scalability).
> PloneSoftwareCenter made substantial progress. I think most needed
> adjusments are included in upstream today.
>
>
> > In the meantime I tried to do a "buildout" of this new fork, using the
> > instructions here:
> >
http://live.gnome.org/GnomeWeb/PloneImplementation
> > (Using wgo.buildout-dev instead of wgo.buildout. I guess you renamed
> > that.)
> >
> > But when running the instance, and trying to look at it in a browser, I
> > got this crash:
> >
> > murrayc murrayc-x61:~/checkouts/gnome224/gnomeweb-plone-fork2/wgo.buildout-dev$ ./bin/instance fg
> > /home/murrayc/checkouts/gnome224/gnomeweb-plone-fork2/wgo.buildout-dev/parts/instance/bin/runzope -X debug-mode=on
>
> [...]
>
> > end_element_ns
> > self._cont_handler.endElementNS(pair, None)
>
> This was a missing file and some other small things. Jonathan fixed them
> today.
>
>
> >>> Here's my recommendations on how to finish up those tasks as fast as
> >>> possible:
> >>>
> >>> 1. Create a publicly-visible task list of what needs to get done.
> >>> We could use
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/ or another hosted
> >>> service, such as Remember the Milk.
> >> There's no reason to use anything other than
bugzilla.gnome.org or
> >>
live.gnome.org.
>
> That sounds good.
>
> >>
> >> We had already been using the "beta" version in the website product in
> >> bugzilla, with the Plone 2 site. Most of those bugs are probalby not
> >> worth worrying about until the Plone 3 site is up and running. Again,
> >> nothing should distract from getting that running - please don't
> >> distract yourselves with attempts to add new features or improvements.
>
> I will install a testsite within two days. But it's no continuation of
> the plone2-"beta". I did not find anything from a plone2-development
> that we could integrate. But maybe I'm missing something.
>
>
> ..Carsten
>
> _______________________________________________
> gnome-web-list mailing list
>
gnome-web-list gnome org
>
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-web-list
