Re: on suspend
- From: Olav Vitters <olav vitters nl>
- To: Jesse Hutton <jesse hutton gmail com>
- Cc: gnome-shell-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: on suspend
- Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 15:53:15 +0200
On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 09:40:08AM -0400, Jesse Hutton wrote:
> Suspend being broken on various hardware is just a fact of life. Send
> complaints to hardware manufacturers.
and that is what we want to change.
At the moment it is a chicken+egg situation. Nobody relies on suspend,
so no incentive to fix it.
> Are Gnome Shell hackers responsible for fixing suspend bugs? Given that the
> standard response seems to be "please report the bug to your distro," it
> seems no. And, while it may end up making suspend work better in the long
> run, it does not create the best experience for users now.
If suspend does not work:
1. The hardware/kernel/whatever should not advertise it as such
I've already outlined a way to detect such cases and override it
2. The bug *has* to be reported and get fixed
Suspend is basically a repeat of:
- NetworkManager
- PulseAudio
--
Regards,
Olav
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]