Re: on suspend
- From: Jesse Hutton <jesse hutton gmail com>
- To: Olav Vitters <olav vitters nl>
- Cc: Bidossessi SODONON <bidossessi sodonon yahoo fr>, gnome-shell-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: on suspend
- Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 09:40:08 -0400
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 2:36 AM, Olav Vitters
<olav vitters nl> wrote:
On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 07:05:12PM -0400, Jesse Hutton wrote:
> Why is Gnome Shell relying so heavily on something that is notoriously
> difficult to make work across a wide array of hardware configurations?
The intend is to rely on it so these problems are reported and fixed.
Suspend being broken is just not acceptable.
--
Regards,
Olav
Suspend being broken on various hardware is just a fact of life. Send complaints to hardware manufacturers.
Are Gnome Shell hackers responsible for fixing suspend bugs? Given that the standard response seems to be "please report the bug to your distro," it seems no. And, while it may end up making suspend work better in the long run, it does not create the best experience for users now.
Jesse
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]
