|
So now you're pulling a "no true scottsman"? What, exactly, makes GNOME Shell "psedo-innovation"[sic] and not true innovation? > To: gnome-shell-list gnome org > From: jb 1234abcd gmail com > Subject: Re: GNOME 3 from Fedora user's perpective - request for changes > Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2011 18:34:31 +0000 > > Adam Tauno Williams <awilliam@...> writes: > > > .... > > > The reaction (not overreaction) by "old-timers" is based on their experience > > > with what works and what not, and with technical and non-technical user > > > bases. > > > Most of these birds are (and should be) concerned with ease-of-use and sane > > > continuity of design of their daily tools. > > > > Bogus. Don't try the old-war-horse defense. I'm an old war horse. > > Professional UNIX admin for >15 years, used LINUX since kernel 0.99a, > > and paid subscriber back in the Ximian days. > > > > There are lots of things that are clunky in the 'legacy' 2.x GNOME, 3.0 > > has some shiney-and-new wobbles, but the direction is well thought out. > > Things change. Move on. > > > > > > Adam, > > I am aware of what innovation is and *am for* moving to GNOME 3. > You misrepresent my intentions. > > I am aginst a psedo-innovation like in case I described in my original post. > It is limited to that aspect, for now. > Get it. > > JB > > > _______________________________________________ > gnome-shell-list mailing list > gnome-shell-list gnome org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-shell-list |